Wayne Sedlak, Ph.D., M.Div., B.A.[1]
Introduction
This position paper is designed to alert people to the dangers of the new assault of the Constitutional Convention. This new Article V “Con Con” will aid the “Left” in its efforts to REPLACE THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES through one of the two Amendment Processes of Article V of the Constitution…a Constitutional Convention (“Con Con”). This Convention will be “reported” by the media as providing necessary “amendments” to the Constitution. But, the powers of this kind of Article V Amendment process has “deep pockets” in that it can REPLACE the whole Constitution by “amending it.” All jurists agree. But, even THAT is not the full scope of the dangers involved. You’ll see. But first, what got us here?
- The New “Jehovah”
The most powerful jurist-professor to influence modern Supreme Court interpretation over the last century was Harvard Law School Dean, Roscoe Pound. He produced more Supreme Court justices – and through them new theories of court interpretation than perhaps any other writer-juristic “influencer” in United States history. He wrote:
We are back to the State as the unchallengeable authority behind legal precepts. The State takes the place of Jehovah handing the tablets of the law to Moses. – Roscoe Pound, 1924
Undoubtedly, the “New Left” rose out of the ashes of corrupt judicial “interpretations” of the Constitution. No one doubts that the Supreme Court has led the nation for nearly a century as the militant herald of “Sociological Jurisprudence.” Meaning? The needs of the group, defined by the “collective-state,” supersedes the protections/freedoms of the individual.[2] It was Roscoe Pound who pioneered this radical interpretation, according to the Encyclopedia Britannica.[3] Pound taught activist judges whose decisions would eventually necessitate an end of the Constitution itself. The activist judges wrought havoc to our nation through radical, alien interpretations. The judges “allowed” the laws to be broken concerning runaway budgets bringing the nation to runaway spending and inflation. They defended abortion, bringing havoc to the streets, courts …and …70 million wombs. Election fraud, burned American flags, wage and price distortions, mortgage fraud,[4] criminal defense absurdities, medical ethics, election finance, term limits, feminism, alternative sexual mores, parental loss of control, alternative marriage rights, transgender “rights,” executive decrees, educational havoc, civil rights bitterness, taxation without limitation, Christianity mocked in the public forum… The list is endless. Crisis after crisis was engineered by the Judiciary. Now, to solve the massive (and contrived) crisis, the Constitution is to be put on the chopping block.
NOTE: All of these issues can be used to gain support for the Con Con. Christians SHOULD NOT BE deceived into supporting Con Con by being convinced a “Pro Life Amendment” can be passed. This 117th Congress is solely in charge of the agenda by ARTICLE V of the Constitution itself. Neither the Congress nor the Con Con itself are bound to accept ANY amendment suggestions from the states. They can. But, they are NOT bound… false media propaganda to the contrary. The only thing binding from the states upon the Congress is the “application” for a Con Con. That’s it!
Despite the ongoing erosion of the Constitution, the “Left” has a morbid fear of the Constitution. Why? Because there are laws and powers “begotten” by the great Constitutional heritage they fear may RETURN…and fall upon their collective heads! One especially comes to mind: “Void Judgment.”
- Void Judgments and Void Legal enactments
Void Judgments are invoked when a court case is revisited by a judge and the court finds that the evidence involved in deciding an earlier decision was falsified. That means the judgement was procured by “fraud upon the court.”
ALL that occurred in the election and the multitude of court cases in which the Constitution and other laws were twisted by falsified evidence (Obama’s credentials come to mind) are to be revisited and declared as VOID (not Voidable!). If so, those decisions are to be overturned.
As far as the election is concerned, ANY acts of willful fraud that helped determine Court decisions, Void the results. It is NOT necessary to determine whether a difference in the count of votes or electors was made. The result is fraud.
The same thing occurs with falsified governors’ enactments, legislative decisions, administrative enactments … if based upon fraudulent evidence which is deemed “Material” (evidence necessary to reach a decision), then the acts are to be deemed fraud, therefore, void or even “unconstitutional.”
- Republicans: The Secret Weapon of Democrats
“If power corrupts, then being out of power corrupts absolutely.” The Democrat-Marxist alliance owns the political arena through Fraud. Now they must legalize and strengthen their power base.
An old ‘60s political “saw” bears repeating…“The Democrats drive it down the field. The Republicans put it in the end zone.” The Republicans in many of the 50 states lead a massive movement to help this radical Congress do what the Democrats cannot do without Republican help. Of course, that implicates some like “agent provocateur”[5] leader Republican Robin Vos of Wisconsin, who either lead the movement as advocates or act as willfully inept alleged “opposition.”
However, ANY legal act utilizing fraudulent evidence and passed into law by decree or judicial action is VOID ab initio (Void from its inception). The current Democrats came to power through admitted fraud and the Supreme Court refused to hear ANY election cases. The election fraud invites a NEW alleged “constitutional crisis”…and the Republicans, gobs of them, refuse to allow the election fraud to be exposed!
The Supreme Court refused to hear the Pennsylvania Election Fraud lawsuit and MANY other state lawsuits as well. In his dissent, Justice Thomas argued that mass mail-in voting was used in Pennsylvania for the first time in the 2020 presidential election. He wrote that such an act ALSO coalesced with last minute rewritten rules making elections prone to fraud.[6]
One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence.[7]
Note: “lack of public confidence” (“erosion of voter confidence.”) in “Constitutional” government. THIS IS THE CREATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS, begging an alleged need for a Con Con. Since this fraudulently elected Administration and Democrats have majorities in BOTH Houses of Congress, the Supreme Court’s nod of approval in refusing to hear election fraud cases puts our Constitution at risk by a new “crisis.” After all, it is alleged, we are too divided as a nation so we must “do something.” The Court sent the message of “looking the other way” thus creating a constitutional crisis!
- Do you want the Bad News… the Really Bad News or the REALLY REALLY Bad News… First?
Right now in Wisconsin, for example, the Con Con is in committee. (They are NOT calling it that. You need to call to find out about Wisconsin’s application to Congress to Amend the Constitution). The media is being VERY quiet about this so as NOT to alarm people.
First, the Bad News: Article V gives 34 states the power to apply to Congress for a Constitutional Convention to amend our Constitution. They are NOW only about 6 states short. The states will all have Amendments to demand. But, as Chief Justice Burger – and all jurists of repute (to date) state… neither the Congress nor Con Con need honor any state amendment demands. All legal experts of repute agree.
Now the REALLY Bad News: The Con Con need not keep the Constitution at all. They can Amend the entirety of the Constitution, giving us a whole new document (and full forgiveness of all their criminal transgressions under the old Constitution!). That’s called a “Runaway Constitutional Convention” (and the new Constitution is already written, patterned after the UN and Soviet “Constitutions”).
Now for the REALLY, REALLY Bad news: The Deep State “engineers” of Con Con are poised to give us “privileges” (NOT RIGHTS!). A privilege is a power you must APPLY to receive from the government. It is NOT guaranteed. Congress has already shown its “hand” in the current bill, H.R. 127:
“A BILL To provide for the licensing of firearm and ammunition possession and the registration of firearms, and to prohibit the possession of certain ammunition.”
There it is! They declare a right of Constitutional Law (2nd Amendment) as only a licensing privilege. You must now apply for a license to own a gun…EACH gun…with the government’s RIGHT to deny you (Cost of the license: $800). Severe penalties are invoked, including decades of jail time!
But, the Supreme Court still could invoke the 2nd Amendment. State Legislatures CAN resist it state by state. Local county and city officials can – and should – RESIST enforcement by employing the Doctrine of Interposition of the Lesser Magistrate. The Marxist-Democrats want Con Con to rewrite all levels of government UNDER Federal control. Want to stop them?
|
Contact us at 262-597-2030; support@visionviewpoint.com; VisitVisionViewpoint.com This position paper is offered for educational and informational purposes only and is not offered as legal advice for any particular case(s). Download PDF of CON CON HERE |
[1] Dr. Wayne Sedlak has spent 47 years as a pastor, historian and as a missionary on two continents. He is currently a graduate school professor for educational training of indigenous (tribal) students in Africa and worldwide…
[2] J. A. Stormer. Betrayed by the Bench. (Liberty Bell Press: Florissant Missouri, 2005), 64
[3] Ibid., 67
[4] Mickey Paoletta, Universal Bankruptcy and Economic Bondage: The Science and Threat of the Federal Reserve (copyright October, 2018 Mickey Paoletta), 19-51
[5] See position paper “The Agent Provocateur” by this author.
[6] Katie Pavlich. Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is ‘Inexplicable.’ Townhall.com, Copyright © Townhall.com/Salem Media February 22, 2021 Online article archived and accessed by Dr. Wayne C Sedlak, 2/25/2021; https://townhall.com/ tipsheet/katiepavlich/2021/02/22/three-supreme-court-justices-believe-pennsylvania-election-case-should-be-review-n2585115
[7] Ibid
