Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee
(The following is arranged in Q&A format for your quick reference convenience. Bear in mind the quotes are German speakers with some minor German to English fluency problems.)
by Dr. Wayne C. Sedlak
For a Downloadable PDF of this post CLICK HERE
- What is the Corona Extra-Parliamentary Inquiry Committee? (also called the “ACU”)
It is an ever-growing (currently numbering 1000) German based, international panel of experts including virologists, bacteriologists, epidemiologists, economists, legal experts, doctors, social affairs experts – all with expertise from relevant fields who handle the Covid-19 “pandemic” from a professional standpoint.
- What are their concerns?
In their words… “We investigate why these restrictive measures were imposed upon us, why people are suffering, whether there is proportionality of the measures to this disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. We have serious doubts these measures are proportionate…This needs to be examined since parliaments – neither the opposition parties nor the ruling parties – have convened a committee.”
- Are the government mandates needed for Covid?
“We ask ourselves: Why are people no longer allowed to visit their parents in retirement homes? Is there such a great risk of infection? Do we really have a killer virus here? Do we have rabies or do we have the plague? We do not have the plague! … We do not have to be more afraid than the last few years with normal flu waves, because this is exactly how this one seems to be.”
- Are the Government mandates grossly negligent?
According to an internal report from the Federal Ministry of the Interior (Germany), 90% of all necessary operations in Germany were not carried out, which affected 2.5 million people. This report also writes that there will be 5000 to 125,000 deaths resulting from these government measures. These are human beings, fellow citizens who have already died or are still dying. This [government] report was dated May 7, 2020. It is more than grossly negligent that government agencies do not disclose these things and, as it seems, orchestrate them, because the scientific data already shows that there is no basis for these measures.”
- Government “proportional response” and verification?
Because we are dealing with a lack of proportionality, governments have to make decisions, and in emergency situations… they are obliged to constantly verify these measures. Instead we receive out of context numbers, numbers that are only capable of fueling fear by simply adding up cases of illness and not showing that there is a mismatch between the number of people tested and those actually infected. Existing, well-functioning structures, such as the Infection Proportion Act (German), are simply suspended and replaced with something new, far more drastic and the only thing we hear from the government is the constant call for a vaccination for a disease that we know now very well – by too many international studies – that it is very comparable to flu diseases, that the death rates are no higher than during strong flu waves and that the measures cannot be justified.”
- Dangers of Covid vaccination?
There is not even a sufficient number of people in Germany getting sick to be tested for a vaccine. Plus, it is in the form of vaccination, a so-called RNA vaccination, and unlike previous vaccinations, they would change the genetic code which can cause undeniable damage to people.”
- What of the charge of “governmental bias?”
“It is a terrifying ignorance where recognized international studies and experts from all fields – virologists, bacteriologist, epidemiologists, or economist – are simply not heard or ignored. Even worse, they are called liars, charlatans, or conspiracy theorists…” “Fundamental rights are being restricted, democracy is being restricted, the press is no longer a free press, but you get the feeling that there is propaganda going on, when foreign opinions are censored, deleted, then you have to take to the streets, then you have to be active, or you have to try, for example, to inform the public, as we do with a Corona inquiry committee. Because, of course, there is always the risk that power corrupts and that, at some point, politicians stop seeing things with the right measure and aim.”
- What further governmental concerns are there?
“…[M]ore and more efforts to turn our free and democratic constitutional system into a new surveillance state, with mind control, surveillance apps and the like, under the guise of infection protection laws…The best case scenario is that there is a complete, legal clarification of the background of these measures, which are out of proportion both from a scientific – medical and human point of view, that those responsible are also held accountable, and that situations such as the swine flu, where vaccinations left people with vaccine damage for a disease that should not have been vaccinated, are not repeated!”
- Is there the deliberate creation of panic?
All the measures that have been taken must be scaled back, because they have been developed against the background of horror scenarios that never happened, that are still held up to spread fear among the population of a deadly disease that does not exist in this form. And at best, of course, it will be established – and this has to be done – the lockdown and the mask requirement must be ended immediately.
Do the protests signal a medical contradiction?
We had large mass demonstrations against racism in 20 major German cities, with more than 20,000 participants. If this virus in this form were actually still rampant in Germany with this infection rate, we would have seen a massive increase in the number of infections today. This is not the case.” This was cited as yet one more medical signal of measures being implemented that are undeniably biased.
- What is the (Germany) Constitutional concern?
“We citizens must regain our sovereignty and we also claim the right to do so because we have this right. We stand on the foundation of the Basic Constitutional Law. The Basic Constitution Law…has a wonderful article, article 20, paragraph 4: “Everyone has the right to resist if no other measures remedy the situation”.
- Is the perspective of this Body international in scope?
“[W]e don’t just have the German perspective, but that we also bring an international perspective in the process.” This Body agrees that the investigation conducted is necessary because “… inappropriate decisions have been made irresponsibly from the outset, either grossly negligent or deliberately, that the necessary duty of care, that is to say, without even the slightest consideration for collateral damage.”
- What about retirement home mandates?
There is obviously also been an attempt to compensate for blatant misconduct, such as the neglect of those in need of protection – people in retirement homes – by means of draconian, untargeted measures, perhaps in order to avoid having to justify this misconduct as well, at least to divert attention from these problems. Whether this was done unintentionally, i.e. based on ignorance, or intentionally, i.e. based on questionable motives, is basically irrelevant in the end. In any case, the decision-makers disqualify themselves.
- What about the media coverage worldwide?
“…[B]ased on the experience with the extremely one-sided presentation by politics and state broadcasters, or the state media, this can ultimately only be done by an independent, i.e. extra-parliamentary, corona inquiry committee… This includes the basically ongoing sketching of worst-case scenarios, fear mongering, and creation of inappropriate comparisons, also in the media. For example, just think of this excruciating catchword “Italian conditions”, which was at best true for some northern Italian regions, while the Southern Italian regions – which are normally poor and worse off – cope with the whole thing without any major problems. Inappropriate, eye-catching depictions of threatening trends, which in practice never materialized and, with proper assessment from the start, given the quality of healthcare system in Germany, could never have occurred in this way.” They made the point that “… This approach (was) contemptuous to health and human beings in stark contrast to the professional understanding and ethics of all of us. This permanent fear or panic mongering, resulting psychological and social damage [is] to be expected, the gigantic medical and economic collateral damage, and last but not least, the massive interventions in all of our cultural lives and cohabitation, are… reason and motivation enough to stand up and fight this insanity.”
- What about accountability and proven misconduct?
“In view of the disaster, the scope which can currently not be assessed at all, it seems necessary, with due respect, of course, but unambiguously, to press for an objective assessment of these decisions and to hold the decision-makers accountable in the event of proven misconduct.”
[Insert from this author: All of the above is true with respect to the criminal acts of Gov. Tony Evers of Wisconsin and his chief medical officer. It is also applicable to the Vice Governor. The people of Wisconsin must not settle for anything less than the removal of all three officers from office and that criminal violations be attached to their conduct. It’s one thing for them to be wrong; that is human. We’re not talking about mere mistakes. They have been demonstrably criminal in the violation of their oaths of office, their unconstitutional misconduct, the damaging of individuals, the ruin of cities, their threats of fines and imprisonment, their unheralded creation of panic among the population, the record economic damage they inflicted and the ruin of people’s finances, savings, and homes. Wisconsin needs to get an immune system, so that this kind of conduct is most severely reprimanded. This would pose a threat to any future “tyrant wannabes.” Republicans such as GOP assemblyman Robin Vos, have twisted the law and run interference for this incredibly crooked Democratic governor. Robin Vos needs to be held accountable as well! Some of the Republicans continue to masquerade under the banner that “some of Tony’s edicts are lawful.” Why is upright, Constitution redress of grievance always “all thumbs” when it comes to remedies? If THIS GOVERNOR’S ACTIONS cannot be remedied through the Wisconsin Constitution– for example at 323.1 – then what’s the sense of having a Constitution at all?]
- Summary statements:
- the German healthcare system has never been even close to running the risk of being overburdened
- that measurement figures, such as the doubling rate in this dreadful number “RO”, have the primary purpose of creating fear and putting pressure on the population, and were communicated in an un-objective and manipulative way for lack of reference to the number of tests carried out; that false and untrustworthy fatality figures have been misused for intimidation purposes;
- that the number of cases was already significantly declining well before the lockdown;
- in a general mask wearing obligation ordered four weeks later, (repeat LATER) was factually unfounded, unlawful and psychosocially irresponsible; (Emphasis added herein);
- that the incorrigible sticking to the measures and already refuted statements, i.e., against better knowledge and proven evidence, is a criminal offense in this context and…that ultimately a drastic change in the party political decision-making structures is overdue…to reliably prevent this anti-democratic approach from being continued or repeated.
We here at VisionViewpoint.com concur with the above and see the same process occurring in Wisconsin and throughout the United States. Contact us HERE
We need your gracious non-tax-deductible contributions. To give click HERE
Covid Image Credit
Vaccination Image Credit
Protest Image Credit
Covid Mask Image Credit
ACU Image Credit
